Feds Announce New Guidelines for Use of Sea Otter Pelts
Thursday, 21 November 2013
The federal government has finalized new guidelines on the use of sea otters by Alaska Natives. The change is aimed at better-defining a requirement that hides must be “significantly altered” in order to be considered authentic Native handicrafts or clothing that can be sold to non-natives.
Andrea Medeiros is a spokesperson for the US Fish and Wildlife Service, which has been working on the revised wording for more than a year.
“These are guidelines and they are to help the Native artisans to understand what exactly qualifies as significantly altered.”
The final guidelines say a sea otter will be considered “significantly altered” when it’s not recognizable as a whole hide and has been made into handicrafts or clothing. The language goes on to define that in more detail.
It’s a positive step, according to the Sealaska Heritage
Institute which teaches classes in the Native tradition of skin sewing.
Chief Operating Officer Lee Kadinger (KAY-ding-ger) says the new wording
still needs some adjustment but, overall, he says the changes are
appreciated. Kadinger thinks it helps clear up a term that he says has
caused significant harm to artisans over the years:
significantly altered to more align with the marine mammal protection
acts original intent is going to, we feel this language is going to help
continue a tradition practiced since time immemorial without fear of
prosecution…Protecting this inherent cultural right is not only good
public policy but it supports and preserves cultural diversity and
respects the traditions and lifestyles of Alaska Native people.”
The new definition of “significantly altered” is very similar to
language endorsed last year by the Alaska Federation of Natives. That’s
with the exception of a line requiring that an otter skin be changed
enough that it cannot be easily converted back to an unaltered hide or a
piece of hide. According to Kadinger, S-H-I is concerned over the words
“piece of hide” since it would be hard to prevent someone from cutting a
piece of fur from finished clothing or handicrafts.
it is acceptable to require individuals, or an item, that cannot be
converted back into an unaltered hide. Conversely, we feel including the
few words ‘cannot be easily converted back into a piece of hide’ is
unnecessary and problematic. So the real issue there is the four words
piece of hide that we hope to continue to work with Fish and Wildlife
service to understand what that part means.”
While Native groups
applauded the new definition, others opposed the change as an attempt
to weaken protections on sea otters and encourage more hunting of the
animals, which have come into conflict with some of Alaska’s